Notes
on Language and Linguistics
Module
-I - Language
Definitions of language.
Though
all of us know what language is, it is very difficult to make a standard
definition that fully explains the term language. The term language can be
understood better in terms of its
properties and characteristics. However, there have been some definitions given
by some linguists though they have been far from satisfactory.
1).
According to Robins ‘language is a
symbol system based on pure or arbitrary
conventions… infinitely extendable and modifiable according to the changing needs and conditions of the
speakers’. According to this definition,
language is a symbol system. The symbols form together to make the alphabet of
the language. The language is arbitrary in the sense that there is no one to
one correspondence between the structure of a word and the thing it stands for.
2).
“Language is a purely human and non-instinctive method of communicating ideas, emotions and
desires by means of a system of voluntarily produced symbols”-Sapir
For
Sapir language is species –specific and species-uniform. Only human beings
possess language .Animals do have a communication system but it is not a
developed system.
3) “Language is the institution whereby humans
communicate and interact with each other by means o habitually used oral –auditory arbitrary
symbols”-Hall
This
definition stresses on speech produced by oral-auditory symbols.
4).
“A language is a set of (finite or infinite) of sentences, each finite in
length and constructed out of a finite set o elements”-Noam Chomsky
He
opines that each sentence has a
structure. The human brain is competent enough to construct different sentences
out of the limited set of sounds/symbols in a language.
5).
“ A language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols used for human
communication”-Wardaugh
6).
“ A language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols by means of which a social
group operates”- Bloch and Ttrager.
Both
the definitions point out that language is a system. Words/ sounds are joined according to this system. If only
words are put in the right order they make proper sense or else they will be
senseless.They say that language is system of systems.
7).
“Language is undoubtedly a kind of means of communication amon human beings. It
consists primarily o vocal sounds. It is systematic, articulatory , symbolic
and arbitrary” –Derbyshire.
Derbyshire
emphasis the point that only human beings use language to communicate. A society without language would be impossible
to think of.
8).
“languages are the principal system of communication used by particular groups
of human beings within the particular society (linguistic community) of which
they are members”- John Lyons
From
the above definitions it is clear that they speak of various characteristics of
languages.
Characteristics
of Language.
a).
Language is a means of communication.
Language
is a very important means of communication between humans.Though there are many
other means of communication like gestures, nods, winks, short-hand, Braile
alphabet, horns etc. we cannot think of a human society without language. It is
species specific and species uniform. It is because o language that human
beings are called talking animals. Animals too have a system of communication
but it is very limited with a few sounds expressing hunger, anger or fear.
b).
Language is arbitrary.
The
language is arbitrary in the sense that there is no one to one correspondence
between the structure of a word and the thing or the idea it stands for. There
are a few words (onomatopoeia) indicating the very sound they produce. But for
the same sound different languages have different words. Though the arbitrary
nature of language permits change, its conventionality gives it stability.
c).
Language is a system of systems
Language
is not an amorphous, a disorganised or a chaotic combination of sounds. The
graphic and phonic substance of the language is systematically arranged in
order to form meaningful words and sounds. Again words are arranged in a
particular way to frame meaningful sentences.
Language
operates at two levels – Phonological and syntactical.At the phonological
level, there are some fixed combinations in which consonant clusters are formed
at the beginning and end of a sentence. At the syntactical level there well laid rules of grammar with regard
to the formation of sentences. This phonological and syntactic property of
language is termed as the duality of
language.
d).Language
is primarily vocal
Language
is primarily made up of vocal sounds
produced by a physiological articulatory mechanism in the human body. A
human child learns to speak first as he/she begins to imitate the sounds
produced by other human beings in his/her vicinity. He/she learns to write much
later. It is because of this reason that some linguists say that speech is primary and writing is
secondary.
e).
Language differs from animal communication in several ways.
Language
is species specific and species uniform. Only human beings possess language.
Animal communication differs from human language in a number of ways.
i)
Human language can
convey a large number, or an infinite set of messages whereas the number of
message in animal communication is very limited. Animals communicate their
fear, anger or huger through their natural sounds peculiar to each species.
ii)
Language makes use of
clearly distinguishable discrete, separately identifiable symbols while animal
communication systems are often continuous and non discrete.
iii)
Animal communication systems are closed
systems that permit of no change, modification or addition. Language on the
other hand, is changing and growing every day and new words are added to the
language. Moreover, human language I non-instinctive in the sense that every
human child has to learn language from his/her elders or peers in society.
iv)
Another important property
possessed by human language is called Displacement. A human being can talk in
present tense, past tense or future tense whereas animals cannot communicate
what happened yesterday or what will happen tomorrow. They communicate only in
the present context. It is thi property of displacement that enables human
beings to create fiction and describe the past as well as the possible future
events.
f).
Language is a form of social behaviour.
Every
language has to be learned. A human child learns to speak the language of the
community or the group in which he/she
is placed .If a Chinese infant is brought up in an Indian family he/she would
pick up that Indian language to which he/she is exposed. Language is thus a
form of the social behaviour.
g).
Language is a symbol system.
A
symbol is a concrete event, object or mark that stands for something relatively
abstract. Words in a language are also symbols that stand for objects. A
speaker or writer wants to communicate with another fellow being, puts his
message across in the form of symbols (in speech or writing). The receiver of
the message, who shares those symbols (words/sounds), understands the message
by interpreting the symbols. Thus language is a symbol system though different
languages use different symbols.
Module II
Linguistics
Linguistics
is a term derived from the Latin terms lingua
meaning tongue and istics meaning
knowledge or science. Linguistics is thus the scientific and systematic study
of language.
Is Linguistics a Science?
Linguistics
is a science that describes and classifies language. The substance of a
language may include phonic and graphic. The study of phonic substance is
called phonetics which includes the description of vocal organs, the
articulation of sound, its transmission and audition etc. All these topics are
included in pure science s like biology and physics. These activities may be
observed through experiments. The graphic substance of language is purely about
the material aspects of the written language. A linguist uses many a
sophisticated instruments like endoscope,sonograph,kymograph,pitch
meter,oscillograph,mingograph etc to study about different aspects phonetics.
Again,
like a scientist the linguist develops hypothesis, makes generalized
statements, and tests them against the established facts about language. Like a
scientist the phonetician observes the features of words, their similarities or
differences and then classifies or defines them.
In
the study of phonetics the linguist is very close to pure sciences like
biology, physics, physiology etc. Linguistics shares some aspects of social
science as it studies language which is a form of social behaviour.
Linguistics
is thus both an empirical and a social science. According to Robins-“It is an
empirical science and within it, it is one of the social sciences, because its
subject matter is human, and is very much different from that of natural
sciences”.
From
the above points it can be concluded that linguistics is the scientific study
of language.Liguistic analyses are objective, tentative and systematic.
Scope
of Linguistics
Linguistics
is a specific modern discipline which describes the
nature,scope,structure,production and transmission of language independently.
The modern linguistics is chiefly descriptive but there are also other aspects.
(A)
Descriptive Linguistics
Descriptive
linguistics deals with the description and analysis of the ways in which a
language operates and is used by a given set of speakers at a given time.
Descriptive linguistics is the fundamental aspect of the study of languages. It
describes how a language works rather than how a language should be and what is
its relation with other languages. It describes language systematically at all
levels such as phonology, morphology, syntax and syntactic analysis.
Linguistics is descriptive not prescriptive
Linguistics
is a descriptive (non-normative) science because the linguist tries to discover
and record the rules to which the members of a language community actually
conform and does not seek to impose upon them other rules or norms of correctness.
Prescriptive
linguistics prescribes how things ought to be. In other words prescriptive
linguistics is rather normative. The most important distinction between
prescriptive and descriptive linguistics is that- prescriptive dos and don’ts
are commands while descriptive dos
and don’ts are statements.
Traditional grammar was very much prescriptive or normative in character.
(B)
Historical Linguistics
It
is the study of the developments in languages in the course of time, the ways
in which languages change from period to period and the causes and results of
such changes…it must be based on description of two or more stages in the
development of the language being studied. Historical linguistics thus
describes changes in language systems over a period of time and considers their
relationship with families. The study of the changes that have taken place in
English from Old English to Middle English and then Modern English comes under
the head historical and comparative linguistics.
(C)
Comparative Linguistics
It
deals with the distinction among languages. If Hindi is contrasted with Urdu,
or Tamil with Telgu, such type of distinction comes under the head comparative
linguistics.
Modern linguistics
Modern
linguistics is associated with Ferdinand de Saussure, the Swiss linguist who
introduced a totally new concept of language study called the structuralistic
notion of language. Saussure’s lecture notes were later published by his students after his death,in
the year 1915 titled ‘Course in General
Linguistics’.
Basic
Assumptions
According
to Saussure language is a system of systems. The system contains a number of
sub-systems as its components. It can be observed in the English language- that
there runs a system in the way phonemes are arranged and combined to form
morphemes, words and sentences. Human language is divisible in to systems which
are interconnected at each level. At the initial level the basic sound units or the phonemes come. The phonemes are the building blocks of any
language and their selection and arrangement varies from language to language.
Saussure
held the view that language is a social fact and a semiotic system- system of signs.
According to him each linguistic sign is composed of a signifier and a signified i.e.,
signifier + signified > sign. By signified he
meant the phonic or graphic part of the sign. The signified is what is referred
to or the referent or the concept behind the signifier. The relationship
between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary i.e., there is no natural
relationship between the signifier and the signified.
The study of signs constitutes the field of
semiotics or semiology. Every language being a system of signs, semiotics has
greater application in cinema, myth, advertising and painting.
The
modernist linguists value all varieties and styles in a language whether spoken
or written, formal or informal etc. The modern linguist studies language in
terms of observable and verifiable data. This is what Saussure meant by saying
that linguistics is descriptive, not
prescriptive. The prescriptive
grammarians tell the speakers what forms they should use and what they should
not. Both the prescriptive and descriptive linguists make use of rules. The
descriptive linguists work under the assumption that change is natural for
languages.Saussure’s
language study is built on the assumption that each language is a self
sufficient system capable of handling
the communicative needs of the society that makes use of it.
Synchronic
and Diachronic description of language.
The
terms synchronic (descriptive) and diachronic (historical) have been given
by Saussure to describe a stage of a
language at a given time and the
changes that take place during the passage of time. A synchronic description is
non-historical where as diachronic description traces the historical
development of a language. The study of how a language works at a given time,
regardless of its past history or future destiny is called synchronic or
descriptive linguistics. Synchronic linguistics studies a language at one
period in the sequence of time .It involves the way people speak in a speech
community in a given period of time.
Diachronic
linguistics study how speech habits change as time goes by or in other words it
deals with the development of languages through time. While synchronic
linguistics deals with systems the diachronic linguistics deals with the units.
But they cannot be regarded as separate compartments because linguistics is
studied at both levels.
Synchronic
and Diachronic description of language.
The
terms synchronic (descriptive) and diachronic (historical) have been given
by Saussure to describe a stage of a
language at a given time and the
changes that take place during the passage of time. A synchronic description is
non-historical where as diachronic description traces the historical
development of a language. The study of how a language works at a given time,
regardless of its past history or future destiny is called synchronic or
descriptive linguistics. Synchronic linguistics studies a language at one
period in the sequence of time .It involves the way people speak in a speech
community in a given period of time.
Diachronic
linguistics study how speech habits change as time goes by or in other words it
deals with the development of languages through time. While synchronic
linguistics deals with systems the diachronic linguistics deals with the units.
But they cannot be regarded as separate compartments because linguistics is
studied at both levels.
Other
Branches of Linguistics
Psycholinguistics
Language
is a mental phenomenon and whatever we think is expressed in language
behaviour. Psycholinguistics studies these mental processes such as thought and
concept formation. It also studies the influence of psychological factors such
as intelligence, motivation and anxiety on the kind of language that is
understood and produced. Our perception of sounds and graphic symbols (writing)
is influenced by the state of our mind.
Sociolinguistics
It
is a branch of linguistics that studies the relation between language and society.
Language changes its form and structure on the basis of social class, gender,
religion and cultural groups. A particular social group may speak a different
variety of a language from the rest of the community. Such a group of speakers
comes under the head Speech Community. The educate people in England speak
English RP (Received Pronunciation) which is different from the English spoken
in other areas like Yorkshire and Lancashire.
Anthropological
Linguistics
It
is a part of the sociolinguistics that studies a specific area of the evolution
of language in human society and its role in the formation of culture. Language
is very much related to the cultural infrastructure of society .Anthropological
linguistics tries to study the variation among languages on the basis of
cultural difference.
Ethnolinguistics
Ethnolingustics,
a part of the sociolinguistics studies the variation in languages on the basis
of social interaction among a few human races and cultures.
Phonology
Phonology
is the study of speech sounds and their function within the sound system of a
particular language. It covers both phonemics and phonetics. Phonology is the
organization of sounds into patterns. The difference between phonetics and
phonology is that, the former studies the sounds of all world languages,
whereas the latter describes the sounds of a particular language. Phonetics is
one and the same for all the language of the world but the phonology of one
language may differ from the phonology of others. Every language has its own selection of sounds an organizes them
into characteristic patterns. Such
selection and organization of the
sounds constitute the phonology of the
language. Phonology is also known as functional phonetics.
Morphology
The
term morphology has been derived from the Greek word morph meaning form and logy
meaning study. Morphology is the branch of linguistics that studies patterns of
word formation within and across languages. Coined in 1859 by august
Schleicher, the term morphology means the science of word formation.
Morphology
describes the patterns of formation of words by the combination of sounds into
minimal distinctive units of meaning called morphemes. A morpheme is the
minimal or smallest individually meaningful grammatical unit of a language. For
example, unhappy has two morphemes-{un},{happy}.A morpheme is different from a
word as many morphemes cannot stand as words.
Free
Morpheme and Bound Morpheme
A
morpheme is free if it can stand alone or if it has meaning in itself. The
bound morpheme are those which have meaning if only they are attached to free
morphemes. In teacher, longer, and preacher, the ‘er’ is meaningless if
they are removed from the root words .They are examples of bound morphemes. But
teach, long and preach have meaning though 'er’ is removed from them. So they can
be called free morphemes. The free morphemes are called roots or bases and the
bound morphemes are called affixes.
Syntax
Syntax
is a branch of grammar which studies the arrangement of words in sentences and
the means by which the relations such as inflexion and word order etc. The word
syntax consists of two word elements ‘syn’ the Latinized form of the Greek
preposition sun which means together and ‘tax’ derived from a Greek root which
means to put in order. Syntax is therefore, the way that words and phrases are
put together to form sentences in a language.
The
sentence ‘A strong bull reads a thick book seriously’ is grammatically correct
but not meaningful. The rules of syntax should explain how sentences are
constructed so that they are both grammatically correct and meaningful. Syntax
two cardinal points: Form and Function. Form is the internal structure of a
unit of grammatical analysis of a phrase or a clause. Form in the context of
syntax refers to terms of categorical labels such as noun phrase, verb phrase,
adjective phrase and adverbial phrase. Function is essentially a relational concept.
Terms like subject, object, subject complement and object complement come under
Functional labels.
Syntax
is divided into two distinct areas. One is related to morphology and the other
to the units higher than that of morphology. The notable difference in
morphology and syntax is that in morphology the minimal syntactic level is
analyzed into morphological units called morphemes and words and into syntactic
units called phrases and clauses.
Semantics
Semantics
is the study of meaning of words and phrases in a language .The origin of the
word semantics is from French word semantique which is related to the
connotation of the words semaino meaning signify, and sema meaning sign.Thus
semantics is related to significant or meaning. In other words, it is that
aspect of linguistics which deals with the relations between referents (names)
and referends (things)-that is, the linguistic levels (words,expressions,and
phrases)and the objects,concepts:or the ideas to which they refer. This field
of study occurs in two aspects: diachronic and synchronic. Diachronic or
historical semantics studies the semantic changes down the ages. Synchronic or
descriptive semantic deals with semantic relationship, simple or multiple. The
application of the appropriate words selecting from synonyms in order to make
the expression right and forceful is included in the field of synchronic
semantics.
Langue
and Parole
The
Swiss linguist Ferdinand De Saussure made a distinction between two aspects of language:
Langue and Parole. Langue means language, that is, all the rules and conventions
regarding the combination of sounds, formation of words and sentences,
pronunciation and meaning. Langue is the product of a social agreement. In
short, Langue is social, a set of conventions shares by all the members of a language.
Langue is abstract, as these particular conventions exist in the minds of the
speakers who belong to that society that has created the language.
Parole
on the other hand belongs to the individual. When those conventions that exist
in the mind as langue are used in a concrete form in actual speech or writing
they become instances of parole. Parole is the actual sounds and sentences
produced by an individual speaker or writer. When we hear a person speak a
language that we do not understand, that is the parole. It is because we are
not a part of that langue out of which the particular parole came. Thus parole
is: Individual performance of language in speech or writing. Parole is concrete
and physical. It makes use of the physiological mechanism such as speech organs
in uttering words and sentences.
Therefore,
it can be concluded that langue exists in the mind of each individual in the
form of word-images and knowledge o conventions, that is, as an abstract form
of the grammar and dictionary of the language.
Saussure
considered langue as the legislative side of language or the law of language.
Parole is the executive side of the language because it uses the law or code of
the language (langue) for its individual ends. According to Saussure, we can
study only langue and not parole because langue is a well-defined homogenous
object distinct from the heterogeneous, unpredictable mass of speech acts.
In
recent years there have been some arguments about these distinctions. Some
sociolinguists regard these dichotomies as unreal. Langue and parole are
interrelated and not separate. Just as parole is not possible or effective
without langue, langue also changes
gradually under the effect of parole.
Competence
and Performance
It
is another concept of language developed by the American linguist named Noam
Chomsky. According to Chomsky, Competence is the native speaker’s knowledge of
his language, the mastery of the system of rules, while Performance is the
production of actual sentences in use in real life situations. So a speaker’s
knowledge of the structure of the language is the speaker’s linguistic
competence and the way in which he uses it is linguistic performance. While
competence is a set of principles which a speaker masters, performance is what
a speaker does.
This
understanding of competence vs. performance as given by Chomsky closely
resembles the langue/parole dichotomy of Saussure But it differs in that while
langue is the same with every language user, competence may differ from person
to person. Saussure’s understanding of langue emphasises its predominantly
social aspect, while Chomsky’s term competence is based on psychology and
presumes individual differences between human beings.
Substance
and Form
Sounds
and symbols such as letters of the alphabet that represent sounds in writing
are the raw materials of a language. They are the phonic (sound) and graphic (written)
substance of the language. All distinct sounds produced by human speech organs
and written scripts are the substance of human language. They have meaning only
when they are given a particular shape or order, that means, it is only when
they have some form that they have meaning.
In
short, we can conclude that substance is the elements or raw materials of
language such as phonemes, morphemes or graphemes, and form is the associative
order in which these are brought together in a meaningful way.
Saji Joseph, Head ,Department of English
LISSAH college Kaithapoyil.